Comments for Ontogenesis

Comment on Considering the Process by Why multiple authors? | The Knowledgeblog Process

Why multiple authors? | The Knowledgeblog Process — Wed, 22 Aug 2012 10:04:42 +0000

[…] was one of our original justifications for using blog technology rather than wiki’s (http://ontogenesis.knowledgeblog.org/691). We can however make a split between two authorship roles […]

Comment on Components of an Ontology by Background: What are ontologies? (Thesis 1.5) « the mind wobbles

Background: What are ontologies? (Thesis 1.5) « the mind wobbles — Tue, 17 Jul 2012 12:20:10 +0000

[…] Lord. Components of an Ontology. Ontogenesis, January […]

Comment on Disjointness Between Classes in an Ontology by Phillip Lord

Phillip Lord — Mon, 02 Jul 2012 20:33:14 +0000

This comment is a review of the article.

Good article; well written, clear and with some entertaining examples. It is a valuable addition to Ontogenesis

Comment on Semantic Integration in the Life Sciences by Additional Front Material (Thesis) « the mind wobbles

Additional Front Material (Thesis) « the mind wobbles — Thu, 14 Jun 2012 13:00:16 +0000

[…] L. Lister. Semantic integration in the life sciences. Ontogenesis, http://ontogenesis.knowledgeblog.org/126. January […]

Comment on Protégé & Protégé-OWL by Sean

Sean — Mon, 07 May 2012 21:59:00 +0000

In Protege, I found that I often need to use ‘some’ and ‘only’ in combination.

The use of some in addition to only, is necessary because only (universal) can match to ALL values for this relation and property, and also to NO matches. The use of some further filters the classification down to those classes that DO have values for this property and relation.

Suggestion – it would be convenient if Protégé had another keyword to specify this very common classification requirement (for example a keyword onlyAndExists).

Comment on Topics by An Exercise in Irrelevance » Blog Archive » The Ontogenesis Tutorial

An Exercise in Irrelevance » Blog Archive » The Ontogenesis Tutorial — Mon, 07 May 2012 12:46:56 +0000

[…] and I’ll let you know whether if anyone else is doing it. Alternatively, there is a list of topics that we hope to make a start in covering. The articles will be peer-reviewed and available for the […]

Comment on Ontogenesis: One Year On by An Exercise in Irrelevance » Blog Archive » Ontogenesis Knowledgeblog: Lightweight Semantic Publishing

Mon, 07 May 2012 12:46:28 +0000

[…] Phillip Lord and Robert Stevens. Ontogenesis: One year one. Ontogenesis, 2011. http://ontogenesis.knowledgeblog.org/1063. […]

Comment on Reflections on Blogging a Book by An Exercise in Irrelevance » Blog Archive » Ontogenesis Knowledgeblog: Lightweight Semantic Publishing

Mon, 07 May 2012 12:46:11 +0000

[…] Sean Bechhofer. Reflections on blogging a book. Ontogenesis, 2011. http://ontogenesis.knowledgeblog.org/647. […]

Comment on Closing Down the Open World: Covering Axioms and Closure Axioms by Making sure my brother and I have the same grandparents « Robert Stevens' Blog

Fri, 16 Mar 2012 09:49:46 +0000

[…] to how many children people have. I’ve also closed parts of the amino acid ontology and written in general about closure. The example of grandparents (and parents etc.) in the FHKB is just another example of having to be […]

Comment on Closing Down the Open World: Covering Axioms and Closure Axioms by Implicaciones de OWA « Hector G. Ceballos, PhD

Implicaciones de OWA « Hector G. Ceballos, PhD — Sun, 24 Jul 2011 06:00:58 +0000

[…] más información respecto a OWA y cómo ayudar al razonador en casos de particiones completas en [3]. La explicación está muy completa pero el ejemplo es algo confuso dado que definen Sex como una […]