<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Ontogenesis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ontogenesis.knowledgeblog.org/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ontogenesis.knowledgeblog.org</link>
	<description>An Ontology Tutorial</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 10:15:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Community Driven Ontology Development by What does a chemical engineer do and don&#39;t bio engineering majors &#8230; &#124; Biological Engineering Addict</title>
		<link>http://ontogenesis.knowledgeblog.org/217/comment-page-1#comment-97</link>
		<dc:creator>What does a chemical engineer do and don&#39;t bio engineering majors &#8230; &#124; Biological Engineering Addict</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 10:15:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ontogenesis.knowledgeblog.org/?p=217#comment-97</guid>
		<description>[...] Community Driven Ontology Development &#124; Ontogenesis [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Community Driven Ontology Development | Ontogenesis [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What is an upper level ontology? by Ontogenesis</title>
		<link>http://ontogenesis.knowledgeblog.org/740/comment-page-1#comment-96</link>
		<dc:creator>Ontogenesis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 18:46:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ontogenesis.knowledgeblog.org/?p=740#comment-96</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Review for What is an upper level ontology?...&lt;/strong&gt;

This is a review of What is an upper level ontology? In this article, Robert nicely covers the different aspects that upper level ontologies need to consider to prescribe a coherent view of the world for its adopters. Here are some specific comments th...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Review for What is an upper level ontology?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This is a review of What is an upper level ontology? In this article, Robert nicely covers the different aspects that upper level ontologies need to consider to prescribe a coherent view of the world for its adopters. Here are some specific comments th&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What is an upper level ontology? by Tweets that mention What is an upper level ontology? &#124; Ontogenesis -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://ontogenesis.knowledgeblog.org/740/comment-page-1#comment-95</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention What is an upper level ontology? &#124; Ontogenesis -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 14:06:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ontogenesis.knowledgeblog.org/?p=740#comment-95</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Jodi Schneider, Jason T. Hewitt. Jason T. Hewitt said: RT @jschneider: What is an upper-level #ontology? [Post at Ontogensesis]: http://ontogenesis.knowledgeblog.org/740 #time #space #ontologies [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Jodi Schneider, Jason T. Hewitt. Jason T. Hewitt said: RT @jschneider: What is an upper-level #ontology? [Post at Ontogensesis]: <a href="http://ontogenesis.knowledgeblog.org/740" rel="nofollow">http://ontogenesis.knowledgeblog.org/740</a> #time #space #ontologies [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Reflections on Blogging a Book by How to write an article for a Knowledge Blog &#124; The Knowledgeblog Process</title>
		<link>http://ontogenesis.knowledgeblog.org/647/comment-page-1#comment-88</link>
		<dc:creator>How to write an article for a Knowledge Blog &#124; The Knowledgeblog Process</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 17:02:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ontogenesis.knowledgeblog.org/?p=647#comment-88</guid>
		<description>[...] rich environment for editing, and particularly not for collaborative editing. Most people get tired of the wordpress authoring tool very quickly, as it&#8217;s just not suited for serious scientific [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] rich environment for editing, and particularly not for collaborative editing. Most people get tired of the wordpress authoring tool very quickly, as it&#8217;s just not suited for serious scientific [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Protégé &amp; Protégé-OWL by alanrector</title>
		<link>http://ontogenesis.knowledgeblog.org/52/comment-page-1#comment-87</link>
		<dc:creator>alanrector</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 10:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ontogenesis.knowledgeblog.org/?p=52#comment-87</guid>
		<description>You should really mention that Protégé has a long history pre-dating OWL and continues to supports a frame representation for ontologies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You should really mention that Protégé has a long history pre-dating OWL and continues to supports a frame representation for ontologies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Reflections on Blogging a Book by Considering the Process &#124; Ontogenesis</title>
		<link>http://ontogenesis.knowledgeblog.org/647/comment-page-1#comment-76</link>
		<dc:creator>Considering the Process &#124; Ontogenesis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 19:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ontogenesis.knowledgeblog.org/?p=647#comment-76</guid>
		<description>[...] this post, I want to address some of the issues raised by Sean Bechoffer in his thoughtful reflection. One of my aims with thinking about the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] this post, I want to address some of the issues raised by Sean Bechoffer in his thoughtful reflection. One of my aims with thinking about the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What is an ontology? by Review of What is an ontology? &#124; Ontogenesis</title>
		<link>http://ontogenesis.knowledgeblog.org/66/comment-page-1#comment-64</link>
		<dc:creator>Review of What is an ontology? &#124; Ontogenesis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 10:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ontogenesis.knowledgeblog.org/?p=66#comment-64</guid>
		<description>[...] is a review of What is an ontology? by Robert Stevens, Alan Rector and Duncan [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is a review of What is an ontology? by Robert Stevens, Alan Rector and Duncan [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ontogenesis: Who&#8217;s here? by Blogging a Book about Bio-Ontologies &#171; O&#39;Really?</title>
		<link>http://ontogenesis.knowledgeblog.org/283/comment-page-1#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>Blogging a Book about Bio-Ontologies &#171; O&#39;Really?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 09:48:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ontogenesis.knowledgeblog.org/?p=283#comment-54</guid>
		<description>[...] about what an ontology is, why you would want to a biomedical ontology, how to build one and so on. We will be doing some of the peer-review online [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] about what an ontology is, why you would want to a biomedical ontology, how to build one and so on. We will be doing some of the peer-review online [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Reflections on Blogging a Book by phillord</title>
		<link>http://ontogenesis.knowledgeblog.org/647/comment-page-1#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>phillord</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 19:39:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ontogenesis.knowledgeblog.org/?p=647#comment-53</guid>
		<description>I think that the versioning issue is soluable -- all the versions are available, it&#039;s just a question of doing stuff to wordpress and with some permalink fiddling. 

But I agree, blogs neither have the versioning nor the collaborative environment of a wiki. Still, there again, I think you have the same issue with a wiki. If you write a page, and I link to it, there is no guarentee that your page will remain the same as it was. 

I will work on a improved process and improved software over the next couple of months. I think it was fairly close, myself. If you disagree, it&#039;s probably just you being one of those incredible picky computer scientists...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that the versioning issue is soluable &#8212; all the versions are available, it&#8217;s just a question of doing stuff to wordpress and with some permalink fiddling. </p>
<p>But I agree, blogs neither have the versioning nor the collaborative environment of a wiki. Still, there again, I think you have the same issue with a wiki. If you write a page, and I link to it, there is no guarentee that your page will remain the same as it was. </p>
<p>I will work on a improved process and improved software over the next couple of months. I think it was fairly close, myself. If you disagree, it&#8217;s probably just you being one of those incredible picky computer scientists&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Semantic Integration in the Life Sciences by Ontogenesis: rapid reviewing and publishing of articles on semantics and ontologies &#171; the mind wobbles</title>
		<link>http://ontogenesis.knowledgeblog.org/126/comment-page-1#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>Ontogenesis: rapid reviewing and publishing of articles on semantics and ontologies &#171; the mind wobbles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 12:22:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ontogenesis.knowledgeblog.org/?p=126#comment-52</guid>
		<description>[...] article on Semantic Integration in the Life Sciences was the first to come out of peer review. Thanks are very much due to Frank Gibson, Michel [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] article on Semantic Integration in the Life Sciences was the first to come out of peer review. Thanks are very much due to Frank Gibson, Michel [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
