<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Ontogenesis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ontogenesis.knowledgeblog.org/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ontogenesis.knowledgeblog.org</link>
	<description>An Ontology Tutorial</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 21:59:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Protégé &amp; Protégé-OWL by Sean</title>
		<link>http://ontogenesis.knowledgeblog.org/52/comment-page-1#comment-11592</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 21:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ontogenesis.knowledgeblog.org/?p=52#comment-11592</guid>
		<description>In Protege, I found that I often need to use &#039;some&#039; and &#039;only&#039; in combination.

The use of some in addition to only, is necessary because only (universal) can match to ALL values for this relation and property, and also to NO matches.  The use of some further filters the classification down to those classes that DO have values for this property and relation.  

Suggestion - it would be convenient if Protégé had another keyword to specify this very common classification requirement (for example a keyword onlyAndExists).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Protege, I found that I often need to use &#8216;some&#8217; and &#8216;only&#8217; in combination.</p>
<p>The use of some in addition to only, is necessary because only (universal) can match to ALL values for this relation and property, and also to NO matches.  The use of some further filters the classification down to those classes that DO have values for this property and relation.  </p>
<p>Suggestion &#8211; it would be convenient if Protégé had another keyword to specify this very common classification requirement (for example a keyword onlyAndExists).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Topics by An Exercise in Irrelevance &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Ontogenesis Tutorial</title>
		<link>http://ontogenesis.knowledgeblog.org/topics/comment-page-1#comment-11567</link>
		<dc:creator>An Exercise in Irrelevance &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Ontogenesis Tutorial</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 12:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ontogenesis.knowledgeblog.org/topics/#comment-11567</guid>
		<description>[...] and I&#8217;ll let you know whether if anyone else is doing it. Alternatively, there is a list of topics that we hope to make a start in covering. The articles will be peer-reviewed and available for the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and I&#8217;ll let you know whether if anyone else is doing it. Alternatively, there is a list of topics that we hope to make a start in covering. The articles will be peer-reviewed and available for the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ontogenesis: One Year On by An Exercise in Irrelevance &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Ontogenesis Knowledgeblog: Lightweight Semantic Publishing</title>
		<link>http://ontogenesis.knowledgeblog.org/1063/comment-page-1#comment-11566</link>
		<dc:creator>An Exercise in Irrelevance &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Ontogenesis Knowledgeblog: Lightweight Semantic Publishing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 12:46:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ontogenesis.knowledgeblog.org/?p=1063#comment-11566</guid>
		<description>[...] Phillip Lord and Robert Stevens. Ontogenesis: One year one. Ontogenesis, 2011. http://ontogenesis.knowledgeblog.org/1063. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Phillip Lord and Robert Stevens. Ontogenesis: One year one. Ontogenesis, 2011. <a href="http://ontogenesis.knowledgeblog.org/1063" rel="nofollow">http://ontogenesis.knowledgeblog.org/1063</a>. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Reflections on Blogging a Book by An Exercise in Irrelevance &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Ontogenesis Knowledgeblog: Lightweight Semantic Publishing</title>
		<link>http://ontogenesis.knowledgeblog.org/647/comment-page-1#comment-11565</link>
		<dc:creator>An Exercise in Irrelevance &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Ontogenesis Knowledgeblog: Lightweight Semantic Publishing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 12:46:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ontogenesis.knowledgeblog.org/?p=647#comment-11565</guid>
		<description>[...] Sean Bechhofer. Reflections on blogging a book. Ontogenesis, 2011. http://ontogenesis.knowledgeblog.org/647. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Sean Bechhofer. Reflections on blogging a book. Ontogenesis, 2011. <a href="http://ontogenesis.knowledgeblog.org/647" rel="nofollow">http://ontogenesis.knowledgeblog.org/647</a>. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Closing Down the Open World: Covering Axioms and Closure Axioms by Making sure my brother and I have the same grandparents &#171; Robert Stevens&#039; Blog</title>
		<link>http://ontogenesis.knowledgeblog.org/1001/comment-page-1#comment-7260</link>
		<dc:creator>Making sure my brother and I have the same grandparents &#171; Robert Stevens&#039; Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 09:49:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ontogenesis.knowledgeblog.org/?p=1001#comment-7260</guid>
		<description>[...] to how many children people have. I&#8217;ve also closed parts of the amino acid ontology and written in general about closure. The example of grandparents (and parents etc.) in the FHKB is just another example of having to be [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to how many children people have. I&#8217;ve also closed parts of the amino acid ontology and written in general about closure. The example of grandparents (and parents etc.) in the FHKB is just another example of having to be [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Closing Down the Open World: Covering Axioms and Closure Axioms by Implicaciones de OWA &#171; Hector G. Ceballos, PhD</title>
		<link>http://ontogenesis.knowledgeblog.org/1001/comment-page-1#comment-2488</link>
		<dc:creator>Implicaciones de OWA &#171; Hector G. Ceballos, PhD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jul 2011 06:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ontogenesis.knowledgeblog.org/?p=1001#comment-2488</guid>
		<description>[...] más información respecto a OWA y cómo ayudar al razonador en casos de particiones completas en [3]. La explicación está muy completa pero el ejemplo es algo confuso dado que definen Sex como una [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] más información respecto a OWA y cómo ayudar al razonador en casos de particiones completas en [3]. La explicación está muy completa pero el ejemplo es algo confuso dado que definen Sex como una [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Review of Components of an Ontology by Phillip Lord</title>
		<link>http://ontogenesis.knowledgeblog.org/550/comment-page-1#comment-1923</link>
		<dc:creator>Phillip Lord</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 13:12:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ontogenesis.knowledgeblog.org/?p=550#comment-1923</guid>
		<description>Thanks for these comments. I have now addressed the specific issues raised, and marked the article as reviewed!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for these comments. I have now addressed the specific issues raised, and marked the article as reviewed!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What is an ontology? by Components of an Ontology &#124; Ontogenesis</title>
		<link>http://ontogenesis.knowledgeblog.org/66/comment-page-1#comment-1922</link>
		<dc:creator>Components of an Ontology &#124; Ontogenesis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 13:03:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ontogenesis.knowledgeblog.org/?p=66#comment-1922</guid>
		<description>[...] Ontology consists of a number of different components. The names of these components differ between [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ontology consists of a number of different components. The names of these components differ between [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Protégé &amp; Protégé-OWL by Metadata in Ontologies = &#124; Ontogenesis</title>
		<link>http://ontogenesis.knowledgeblog.org/52/comment-page-1#comment-1805</link>
		<dc:creator>Metadata in Ontologies = &#124; Ontogenesis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jun 2011 11:04:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ontogenesis.knowledgeblog.org/?p=52#comment-1805</guid>
		<description>[...] provides a set of annotations for these kinds of metadata that are available within tools such as Protege, though they are not part of OWL [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] provides a set of annotations for these kinds of metadata that are available within tools such as Protege, though they are not part of OWL [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Types of Statement in an Ontology = by Higher Order Knowledge in Ontologies = &#124; Ontogenesis</title>
		<link>http://ontogenesis.knowledgeblog.org/1074/comment-page-1#comment-1804</link>
		<dc:creator>Higher Order Knowledge in Ontologies = &#124; Ontogenesis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jun 2011 11:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ontogenesis.knowledgeblog.org/?p=1074#comment-1804</guid>
		<description>[...] this k-blog we look at another kind of statement found in an ontology, higher order knowledge. In this case it is orientated about statements about the class, rather [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] this k-blog we look at another kind of statement found in an ontology, higher order knowledge. In this case it is orientated about statements about the class, rather [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

